Agribusiness and socio-environmental destruction in Paraguay / Agronegócio e destruição socioambiental no Paraguai

Ramón Bruno Fogel Pedroso

Abstract


Agrarian capitalism of the North associated with the emerging powers in the global South-driven generates land-grabbing, the destruction of the environment and of the peasant economy. In this dynamic that has as a transmission belt to Chinese and Brazilian sectors of agrarian capitalism the social and environmental effects are imbricated; while the Brazilian producers are subordinated to the big biotech corporations of the global north that control the technology, the processing and important part of the markets, the Chinese agrarian capital is associated to the banking linked to the agribusiness, and to some of these big seed producing corporations and agro-toxic. The expansion of agroextractivism, basically soybean, alters the physical environment with deforestation and completes the destruction of pre-existing forms of life with the intensive use of biocides, some used as chemical weapons of war. Paraguay, the most transgenic country in the world is also one of the most contaminated   and shows the devastating effects of pollution on human health. In this dynamic coming into the country through mobile borders of Brazil, agribusiness grows at the expense of the peasant sector, linked to the production of food; in the search for alternatives this sector raises the ecologically oriented agriculture, which can become a basic component of a proposal for alternative development. The paper will present good socio-productive practices of peasant agriculture as long as they offer safe food using natural resources in a sustainable way; the socio-environmental and economic advantages of these initiatives are also related to the high added value achieved in a realm of relative autonomy of large biotech corporations. From a methodological point of view, the work responds to an epistemological plurality that values traditional knowledge and learning that social practices leave behind; with a trans-disciplinary approach, the trajectory of agrarian development and its impact will be characterized by the exploitation of available statistical data from the last 5 years, as well as good social and productive practices characterized by secondary data and interviews.

 

 


Keywords


Hegemonic, sustainability, epistemological plurality, neoliberal, sociology of the emerges.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azerrad, M; Tealdo, J, Comp. (2016). Economía social y solidaria: experiencias prácticas en el territorio. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Banco Mundial. (2018). PARAGUAY NOTAS DE POLÍTICA 2018.

Bernstein, H. (2010). Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change. Halifax, Fernwood Publishing, pp. 13-27.

Bieler, A.; Morton, A. (2004) A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: neo-Gramscian perspectives in International Relations. Capital & Class. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680408200106

Cairo. (2010). Articulaciones del Sur Global: afinidad cultural, internacionalismo solidario e Iberoamérica en la globalización contrahegemónica. Geopolitics.

CAN (2008). Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganaderia. Asunción

Cerillo, A (2017). El desacuerdo en la UE impide renovar por cinco años la licencia del polémico herbicida glifosato. LA VANGUARDIA, Barcelona 09/11/2017 12:20 | Actualizado a 10/11/2017.

Conti, M, (2017) Financialization, Agro-extractivism and the role of China: readings from the World System Theory perspective. New Extractivism, Peasantries and Social Dynamics: Critical Perspectives and Debates. The 5th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies. RANEPA, Moscow, Russia.

De Sousa, B. (2002). Para uma Sociologia das ausências e uma sociología das emegências. Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociaís 63, octubre2002

De Sousa Santos B. (2012). Producir para vivir. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México DF. Pp.15-33.

Environmental Protection Agency –EPA (2017). Response to the Final Report of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory Panel

(FIFRA SAP) on the Evaluation of the Human Carcinogenic Potential of

Glyphosate. United States Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 20460. Recuperado de: https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticideproducts/draft-human-health-and-ecological-risk-assessments-glyphosate.

Federovisky, S. (2014). El punto de vista de la crítica ambientalista. La soja como problema. Le Monde Diplomatique (179), pp. 8-9

FIAN Internacional, (2017). Derecho Humano a la Tierra. Documento de posición.

Alemania. Recuperado de: https://www.fian.org/es/biblioteca/publicacione/el_derecho_humano_a_la_tierra/ Fogel, R. (2001) Luchas campesinas. CERI/CIPAE. Asunción, Paraguay.

Fogel, R. et. al. La Transferencia de Tecnología orientada a la Agricultura Familiar

Campesina. CERI/PROCIENCIA. 2017

Fogel, R. (2017) Working paper: Las fuerzas productivas en el desarrollo agrario en el Paraguay. Paraguay: CERI. Recuperado de: http://ceri.org.py/las-fuerzas-

productivas-en-el-desarrollo-agrario-en-el-paraguay/

Friedrich, K; de Almeida, V; Augusto, L; Gurgel, A; de Souza, V; Prado, V; Ferreira, F. (2018) Agrotóxicos: mais venenos em tempos de retrocessos de direitos. Revista OKARA: Geografia em debate, 12, (2).

Hershaw, E; Sauer, S, (2017) The evolving face of agribusiness investment along Brazil’s new frontier: institutional investors, recent political moves, and the financialization of the Matopiba. New Extractivism, Peasantries and Social Dynamics: Critical Perspectives and Debates. The 5th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies. RANEPA, Moscow, Russia.

ID (2017). Evaluación del vínculo entre los sistemas productivos y el uso del agua en el Paraguay en un contexto de cambio climático. CONACYT INV 188.

International Agency for Research on Cancer, (2015). Monographs Volume 112: evaluation of five organophosphate insecticides and herbicides. Lyon, France.

ISAAA, (2017). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops in 2017:

Biotech Crop Adoption Surges as Economic Benefits Accumulate in 22 Years.

ISAAA Brief No. 53. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.

Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería – MAG, (2008). Censo Agropecuario Nacional – CAN. Volumen I, Recuperado de: http://www.mag.gov.py/Censo/Book%201.pdf

Ministerio de Salud Pública y Bienestar Social – MSPyBS (2017). Indicadores Básicos de Salud. Información estadística sobre mortalidad, morbilidad y nacimientos. Asunción, Paraguay. Recuperado de: http://portal.mspbs.gov.py/digies/publicaciones/indicadores/

Nars, L; Sauer, S, (2017) Political mobilization and sustainability: The socioenvironmental movement and the struggle for land and territorial rights in Brazil.

New Extractivism, Peasantries and Social Dynamics: Critical Perspectives and Debates. The 5th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies. RANEPA, Moscow, Russia.

Niederle, P; Gris, C; Picolotto, E; Soldera, D, (2017) Narrative disputes on family farming public policies in Brazil: conservative attacks and restricted

countermovements. New Extractivism, Peasantries and Social Dynamics: Critical

Perspectives and Debates. The 5th International Conference of the BRICS

Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies. RANEPA, Moscow, Russia

Nuila, A. (2018). Derechos colectivos. En la declaración de las naciones unidas sobre los derechos de los campesinos y de otras personas que trabajan en las zonas rurales. FIAN International. Recuperado de: https://www.fian.org/es/biblioteca/publicaciones/

Oliveira, G. (2017). New Extractivism Peasantries and Social Dynamics: Critical Perspectives and Debates. The 5th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies. RANEPA, Moscow, Russia.

Paredes, R; Benítez, J. (2017). Impactos sociales y ambientales del cultivo de arroz en los humedales de Ñeembucu. Economía Agrícola en Paraguay. Asunción: Novapolis. (12). pp. 155-168.

Portal Agronegocios Paraguay, (2018). Agronegocios en Paraguay. El país más tóxico. Recuperado de http://agronegocios.com.py/?p=44096.

Vidal, V. (2013). Análisis de la Información Existente del Estado Actual de los

Bosques y las Principales Causas y Agentes de Deforestación. Programa De Las Naciones Unidas Para El Desarrollo Programa Nacional Conjunto ONU – REDD Proyecto Nº 00078551. Asunción.

SENACSA, (2017). Estadística Pecuaria. Exportación. Recuperado de http://www.senacsa.gov.py/index.php/informaciones/estadisticas.

SENAVE. (2014). Anuario estadístico. SENAVE. (2015). Anuario estadístico.

Yanosky, A. (2013). Paraguay ’ s Challenge of Conserving Natural Habitats and Biodiversity with Global Markets Demanding for Products. Conservation Biology: Voices from the Tropics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118679838.ch14

Zhou Li; Fang Ping, (2017). Multiple Rationality: Peasant's Motivation of Self-

Protection During Food System Transformation in China. New Extractivism, Peasantries and Social Dynamics: Critical Perspectives and Debates. The 5th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies. RANEPA, Moscow, Russia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv5n7-115.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.